2011 Revaluation Review
County Manager Harry L Jones Sr. presented his recommendations to the Board on the 2011 Revaluation Review. The Board determined after the disussion that a special meeting on revaluation would be necessary and will take place Tuesday, November 27, at 3 p.m., at the Government Center.
Recommendations were as follows:
Immediate Board Actions
- Identify and address inequities in neighborhoods
- Develop a detailed work plan for next revaluation
- Build a strong culture of customer service within the Assessor’s Office
- Approve amending the Pearson’s Appraisal Service contract to identify all the neighborhoods where there are major issues of inequity. Estimated cost: $180,000. Estimated time to complete: 90 days
- Direct the County Manager to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit bids to rework all the neighborhoods identified by Pearson’s Appraisal Service where there are major issues of inequity. Although the final scope of work will be contingent on completion of #1 above, staff can begin developing the RFP immediately. Estimated cost range: $1.5 million to $2.5 million. Estimated time to complete: 12 months from award of contract, including the appeal process.
- Direct the Assessor to address the minor issues, consistent with the Pearson’s Appraisal Service findings and recommendations
- Direct the County Manager and Assessor to develop a detailed work plan for the next revaluation that would include:
- Updating property record cards
- A strategy to assess value in complex areas, particularly pre—1980 heterogeneous neighborhoods (e.g., field visits, contracting with appraisers experienced with type of neighborhood)
- Project management of areas with a high volume of appeals
- Quality control strategies
- Construction cost and commercial market studies
- Commercial appraisal approach (e.g., emphasis on income approach)
- Informal appeal objectives and standards (e.g., face-to-face meetings with property owners, one appraiser working all appeals in a neighborhood, deadlines for notices and managing informal appeals)
- Procedures for Board of Equalization and Review, including role of Assessor and staff
- Projected organization and staffing model, other resources and associated cost to implement the work plan and maintain ongoing operations of the Assessor’s Office.
- Note: The detailed work plan will be presented to the Board for any revision and/or concurrence. Prior to presentation to the Board, the detailed work plan will be reviewed by Pearson’s Appraisal Service for consistency with recommendations. The plan also will be disseminated to the public for input/feedback. Pearson’s review of the plan will be included in the contract amendment referenced in #1 above. The detailed work plan is estimated to be developed by June, 2013. The detailed work plan will be presented to the Board for any revision and/or concurrence. Prior to presentation to the Board, the detailed work plan will be reviewed by Pearson’s Appraisal Service for consistency with recommendations. The plan also will be disseminated to the public for input/feedback. Pearson’s review of the plan will be included in the contract amendment referenced in #1 above. The detailed work plan is estimated to be developed by June, 2013.
- Direct the Board of Equalization and Review (BER) to implement changes to its process for scheduling hearings that are more convenient to both appellants and Board members.
District 5 Commissioner Appointed
- Note: In addition to the other BER-related recommended changes to be addressed as part of the detailed work plan per 4h above, staff will develop recommended changes in the recruitment and appointment process for Board selection of BER members to expand the pool of qualified candidates to serve on the BER.
- Legislative Considerations
Staff believes that all of the Pearson recommendations can be implemented under existing state law. If, in the implementation of these recommendations, statutory barriers are identified, proposed legislative changes will be presented to the Board. Additionally, consideration should be given to seeking legislative changes that offer additional clarity. This could include legislation that specifies how much time property owners have to file an appeal, as well as clarification of current language on deadlines associated with the BER adjournment date. County staff also recommends working with the NCACC and/or NC Assessor’s Association to support consistency in the wording used in revaluation notices.
- Management Actions
The County Manager will develop a customer service enhancement action plan that will be initiated by contracting with an outside firm to conduct a customer service assessment of the Assessor’s Office. Based on the assessment findings and recommendations, an action plan will be developed to reform and transform the Assessor’s Office whereby customer service and satisfaction is a top priority.
- It is estimated that it will take 120 days for the County Manager to contract with the outside firm and develop the action plan.
The Board appointed commissioner-elect Matthew Ridenhour to the District 5 seat. Ridenhour was sworn in early to fill the seat held by the late Neil Cooksey. A swearing in ceremony will occur Dec. 3 to officially welcome the new Board.
Health Department Building to be Named in Commissioner Cooksey's Honor
Commissioners voted to rename the health department campus on Billingsley Road after the late Commissioner Neil Cooksey. Cooksey's family was in attendance to share their memories and express gratitude for the honor.
Special meeting to discuss revaluation, Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Swearing-In Ceremony, Monday, December 3, 2012
Regular Meeting, Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Budget/Public Policy Workshop, Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Regular Meeting, Tuesday, December 18, 2012